Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Dallas Jail & Dallas Observer: Mas del Mismo

The Disappeared
Got a missing relative? Maybe you should look in the jail--and good luck with that.
By Jesse Hyde
Article Published Feb 2, 2006, Dallas Observer

By now, the sad story of Walter Mann is well-known. The 69-year-old, schizophrenic and homeless, was held in a Dallas County jail for more than a year for not paying a $50 fine. During his 15 months behind bars, he never saw a lawyer or had a visitor. Each time he was called to appear in court, his case was postponed.
When Mann's cellmate asked him what he was in for, he explained that he had been in a fight with his 13-year-old son. As a result, the boy had been sent to a boot-camp-style detention center for a month, for which Mann was fined $50 (compensation to the county for housing the boy). When Mann failed to pay the fine or show up for a subsequent July 2004 hearing, a judge issued an order to put him in jail and "bring him immediately before a judge...on the next work day." For some reason, that never happened. Had it not been for Mann's cellmate, who brought his case to the attention of a public defender, the old man would probably still be in the geriatric ward of the George Allen Detention Center.

The story is hardly surprising to anyone who has followed Dallas' chronically mismanaged jail system. Former inmates have told stories of feces smeared on walls and drinking fountains. Others have claimed the jail ignored their medical needs, including the family of one inmate who died of congestive heart failure, another who nearly went blind in one eye after an inmate hit him and another who was told he would lose his thumb because the jail had delayed treatment on an infection that had festered so long the bone had broken the skin and turned black.

For the mentally ill in particular, Dallas' jail system is not a safe place, and it's no wonder people like Mann fall through the cracks. One mentally ill inmate nearly died a year and a half ago after the water to his cell was turned off for two weeks. At least two others since 2002 have killed themselves--one with the cord to a pay phone--after jail staff failed to place them on suicide watch or give them psychiatric medication, federal lawsuits allege. And last February, 36-year-old Scott Williams was lost in the jail's system for four days after being arrested for drunk driving. Denied medication for depression and anxiety, Williams became distraught and was moved to a suicide cell, where he stayed for 12 hours, naked, lying on the floor without a blanket, trying to avoid shards of shattered glass. "I was in hell, buddy," Williams told the Dallas Observer in September.

Managing the jail, which consists of five buildings spread out over two blocks in downtown Dallas, has bedeviled the county sheriff's office for more than a decade. The jail has a population of nearly 8,000 people, with a daily turnover of 250 to 500. "It's a small city," explains Sergeant Don Peritz, the spokesman for the Dallas County Sheriff's Office, which runs the jail. When Sheriff Lupe Valdez was elected last January, many hoped she would clean up the mess the jail had become. While she has made some progress--the Dallas County Commissioners Court gave her 33 new guard positions in September and granted a 10 percent pay raise to jailers, deputies and constables--the case of Walter Mann shows how much work she has left to do.

"The question is how many more people are over there just like him," says Brad Lollar, Dallas County's chief public defender. "It happens more often than you think. I mean, once is too much, but this kind of stuff happens all the time."

It was happening "all the time" last January, when glitches in a new computer system failed to keep tabs on inmates. At least 40 defendants were imprisoned for too long, according to The Dallas Morning News. In one case, an inmate was booked February 8 but remained unknown to the court until he managed to get a message to a judge 56 days later.

"It was an unbelievable screwup," says criminal defense attorney Peter Lesser, who said he went to the jail last January to visit a client and was told they couldn't find the man in the system. "Short of going cell-to-cell shouting, 'Johnny John, are you in here? Johnny John, are you in here? Where are you, Johnny John?' they didn't know where he was. It was a true screwup of massive proportions."

Lesser realized the only way he was going to find his client was through the man's wife. So he called her and said, "The next time your husband calls, ask him where he is." She did, and when Lesser returned to the jail he was able to find his client.

Now that most of the kinks have been worked out of the new computer program, inmates don't get lost the way they did last January and February, Peritz says. But someone like Mann, who is mentally ill, could languish in jail, court and jail officials acknowledge. "The whole jail is paper-driven. We need a piece of paper to put you in jail, and we need a piece of paper to get you out. I don't want to point fingers, but we never got the order from the court to release him," Peritz says. "You've got humans involved all around the courts. If somebody drops the ball, this is what happens."

When Mann was released in December he promptly disappeared. He turned up shortly afterward at a church in Oak Cliff, where a newspaper reporter found him dressed in dirty jeans and a soiled Cowboys sweatshirt. He was glad to be out of jail, he said, even though his family had moved to Michigan without him. Until a few days ago, when Mann left for Michigan for a funeral, he was sleeping in the cab of a truck parked near the church.

Ever since Mann's story hit the news, his attorney, David Finn, says he's been inundated with calls from people with similar stories. "It appears to be an ongoing, systematic problem. Every time the proverbial stuff hits the fan, everybody starts pointing fingers, but nothing gets done," Finn says. "It seems that it's been going on for years, and there is an absolute lack of leadership on this issue.

"It's a complicated problem, but ultimately you'd think real leaders would take the bull by the horns and fix this."


Note from Finn: The United States Department of Justice will fix this problem.
Stay tuned.







Judge David Finn

Read more!

DMN & DOJ: So Much For the Silver Star

Get ready Dallas County officials. You are not going to get a silver star or a pat on the back. You are going to taken to federal court by the United States Department of Justice for this pattern of deliberate indifference. You will then either fight the Department of Justice (foolish) or you will enter into a verifiable consent decree with them (wise) wherein you will agree to do all of the things you should have been doing all along. Your day of reckoning awaits. Enjoy the ride.


Federal report says jail needs to clean up its act
Dallas County: Inquiry finds problems with medical care, sanitation


08:44 AM CST on Wednesday, March 8, 2006
By JAMES M. O'NEILL / The Dallas Morning News


Federal officials noted serious lapses in medical care for inmates and numerous sanitation problems at the Dallas County Jail after investigating the troubled facility, county officials said.

Dallas County officials said they were disappointed by the negative feedback they received from U.S. Justice Department investigators, who spent a week at the jail last month.


The Sheriff's Department has started acting on some of the Justice Department's recommendations to improve jail sanitation: cleaning out shower drains and planning to purchase warmer blankets so inmates won't block air vents.

The Justice Department plans to return for further inspections this month.

The Texas Commission on Jail Standards, meanwhile, is touring the jail this week as part of its annual inspection. The commission gave the jail failing grades the past two years.

County Judge Margaret Keliher laid some blame for the federal criticism on the University of Texas Medical Branch, which had handled jail health care for the past three years until its contract ran out March 1. Parkland Memorial Hospital now oversees jail health care.

She said that the problems cited to her by Justice Department inspectors during an exit interview after their visit were first noted more than a year ago in an expert's report to county commissioners. That report noted that it sometimes takes weeks for inmates to receive medications for chronic physical illnesses and for mental illness.

"I was disappointed to find out that UTMB was not doing a better job with health care, including mental health" in light of all the attention the problem has received in the media in the past year, Ms. Keliher said.


Funding, staff concerns

UTMB officials noted that they had told county officials more than a year ago about the need for at least 50 more staffers to improve medical care at the jail but had to run the operation without any appreciable increase in funding or staff.

County commissioners did vote to increase the health care budget by $9 million for the fiscal year that began in September. Most of that, though, will pay for improvements that Parkland has in the works.

In addition, Dr. Owen Murray, UTMB's chief physician executive, said the medical branch has worked with Parkland during the past six months to add nurses and staffers to screen for tuberculosis. He said UTMB and Parkland also worked together to add paramedics to conduct medical screening in the jail's book-in area. Previously, jail guards without medical training conducted medical screening and often failed to identify prisoners with medical or mental health needs.

County commissioner Maurine Dickey said the county also received poor marks from the Justice Department for jail sanitation, particularly in areas that house the mentally ill.


Working overtime

In response, the Sheriff's Department has had maintenance staff working overtime to clean out shower drains in the jail.

"The medical was something we don't control, but the sanitary issues, that's our fault," said Jesse E. Flores, the Sheriff's Department's executive chief deputy. "Sometimes it takes somebody to kick us in the butt and tell us to wake up and do what needs to be done. I'm optimistic that in the long run we'll be a better department for all of this."

The Justice Department also recommended that the jail no longer have inmates do their own laundry, to "ensure proper cleanliness of the inmate uniforms." The change would also improve sightlines for jail guards, since inmates would no longer hang uniforms to dry from balconies.


Clothing changes

Inmate clothing is changed twice a week under state guidelines. The Justice Department recommended that clean clothing be provided three times a week.

The change would require the Sheriff's Department to purchase additional clothing. As a result, officials plan another change that will save money in the long term – switching from the current one-piece prisoner jumper to a sturdier two-piece unit. If a part of the jumper wears out, the entire item must be discarded. But with a two-piece wardrobe, one piece might be saved even if the other piece wears out.

Two versions of the two-piece uniforms are under consideration. One could have come right out of a vintage Hollywood costume shop – white with black horizontal stripes. The other is orange with black stripes.

The Sheriff's Department also has stopped selling newspapers in the jail because inmates who complain they are cold often wet the newspapers and paste them over air vents. "The Department of Justice recommended that this be stopped to improve the sanitation of the jail and air flow," a sheriff's briefing paper states. The sheriff has asked county commissioners for permission to purchase warmer blankets for the inmates.

The sheriff has also asked to buy mattress covers, instead of using two sheets, the current practice. The covers would better protect the mattresses and last longer than the sheets, the department said.

Purchasing an entire supply of mattress covers, warmer blankets and two-piece clothing will cost an estimated $620,400. Some of the department's current clothing and bedding budget will cover that. But the commissioners would have to commit $325,000 from the county's unallocated reserves to fully cover the changes.

E-mail joneill@dallasnews.com
















Judge David Finn

Read more!

The Associated Press: Hunting Accident

Cheney Could Face Charges in Shooting
By MATT CURRY, Associated Press Writer

Wednesday, February 15, 2006
If the man wounded by Dick Cheney dies, the vice president could — in theory at least — face criminal charges, even though the shooting was an accident.


Dallas defense attorney David Finn, who has been a state and a federal prosecutor, said Wednesday that a Texas grand jury could bring a charge of criminally negligent homicide if there is evidence the vice president knew or should have known "there was a substantial or unjustifiable risk that his actions would result in him shooting a fellow hunter."


To indict Cheney, the grand jury would have to conclude that a reasonable person in the vice president's place would say to himself, "I am not pulling the trigger because this other guy might be in front of me," Finn said.


The charge carries up to two years behind bars, but with no previous felonies Cheney would be eligible for probation, the former prosecutor said.


Manslaughter, a more serious charge, would require a prosecutor to prove Cheney was reckless, which would be "virtually impossible under the facts we know today," said Michael Sharlot, professor of criminal law at the University of Texas at Austin.


"With recklessness, the defendant has to be aware of the risk, but choose to ignore it. With negligence, he doesn't have to be conscious of the risk, but a reasonable person would have been," Sharlot said.


As vice president, Cheney has no immunity from prosecution.


Mark Skurka, first assistant district attorney of the three-county area where the shooting took place, said prosecutors did not have an investigation under way.


"If something unfortunate happens, then we'll decide what to do, then we'll decide whether we're going to have an investigation or not," Skurka said.


If District Attorney Carlos Valdez decided to pursue charges, he would forward the matter to a grand jury, which would determine whether to indict Cheney. Valdez, a Democrat, is best known for his prosecution of Yolanda Saldivar, who was sentenced to life in prison for the 1995 slaying of Tejano singer Selena.


Harry Whittington, a 78-year-old lawyer, was struck in the face, neck and chest with shotgun pellets over the weekend while Cheney was shooting at quail. Whittington suffered a mild heart attack Tuesday after a pellet traveled to his heart.


On Wednesday, hospital officials said he had a normal heart rhythm again and was sitting up in a chair, eating regular food and planned to do some legal work in his hospital room. Doctors said they are highly optimistic he will recover.


In a TV interview Wednesday, the vice president accepted full blame for the shooting and defended his decision not to publicly disclose the accident until the following day. He called it "one of the worst days of my life."


If Whittington recovers, Cheney could still face a felony charge of negligently causing injury to an aged person, Sharlot said. But he said such a charge would be "quite unusual" in the case of a hunting accident.


In the only other case of someone being shot by a vice president, Aaron Burr was indicted on murder charges in New York and New Jersey for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel in 1804, but he was never tried and finished out his term in office.















Judge David Finn

Read more!

(AP)CNN Report-Cheney Hunting Accident

If lawyer dies, Cheney might face negligence charge

Wednesday, February 15, 2006; Posted: 3:16 p.m. EST (20:16 GMT)


DALLAS, Texas (AP) -- If the man wounded by Dick Cheney dies, the vice president could -- in theory at least -- face criminal charges, even though the shooting was an accident.

A Texas grand jury could bring a charge of criminally negligent homicide if there is evidence the vice president knew or should have known "there was a substantial or unjustifiable risk that his actions would result in him shooting a fellow hunter," said Dallas defense attorney David Finn.

Finn has worked as both a state and a federal prosecutor.

"The risk must be of such a nature and degree that it got to be pretty outrageous -- that a reasonable person would have to say, `I am not pulling the trigger because this other guy might be in front of me,' " Finn said.


The charge carries up to two years behind bars, but with no previous felonies Cheney would be eligible for probation, the former prosecutor said.

Mark Skurka, first assistant district attorney of the three-county area where the shooting took place, said prosecutors did not have an investigation under way.

"If something unfortunate happens, then we'll decide what to do, then we'll decide whether we're going to have an investigation or not," Skurka said.

Harry Whittington, a 78-year-old lawyer, was struck in the face, neck and chest with shotgun pellets over the weekend while Cheney was shooting at quail. Whittington suffered a mild heart attack Tuesday after a pellet traveled to his heart.

But on Wednesday, hospital officials said he had a normal heart rhythm again and was sitting up in a chair, eating regular food and planned to do some legal work in his hospital room. Doctors said they are highly optimistic he will recover.

In the only other case of someone being shot by a vice president, Aaron Burr was indicted on murder charges in New York and New Jersey for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel in 1804, but he was never tried and finished out his term in office.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Read more!